Hackers Target Tsunami Search Results 57
xsee writes "Only hours after the earthquake and resulting tsunami from Chile, hackers began manipulating search results to direct people seeking information on the event to infected webpages. Exercise caution as to where you get information on this tragedy. Chester Wisniewski describes what happened after he saw a suspicious site listed second on a Google search: 'It appears to be a normal website with information and videos about different Asian tsunamis over the past few years. It is difficult to tell whether this particular page was SEO-optimized, or was an innocent victim of a malicious script. SophosLabs got back to me that this page contains some obfuscated malicious JavaScript that we detect as MAL/ObfJS-R. This script was appended after the normal code on the page.'"
Sick? (Score:4, Insightful)
Firstly, are the media going to pick up on this and if they do, will they spin it as an opportunity to bad-mouth the Web and its communities, as well as encourage talk of "tougher rules" and the like.
Since this is a JS vulnerability, I'd certainly like to see more discussion and thought around how seriously we take JS integration on the web and how we approach it as a core target for evil-doers to exploit. Could more be done?
Lastly, how are the web search engines going to react? Could more things like this call for censorship of Google, Yahoo etc; or at least more claims for 'responsibility of the search engines'?
Re:Sick? (Score:5, Informative)
CNN was actually discussing this in their reporting yesterday. They were very clear about this being done by bad folks, not the web in general, and the things people should look out for. Overall I think they gave it very clear, concise, non-technical coverage that was more than fair.
Re: (Score:2)
CNN was actually discussing this in their reporting yesterday. They were very clear about this being done by bad folks, not the web in general, and the things people should look out for.
Given the amount of money and time CNN has invested in gadgetry and web-whizbangery, over any other network by far, they would be fools to (a) draw too much attention to this unless it becomes a serious problem, and (b) NOT cover it calmly, and without resorting to fear-mongering. I suppose that answers GP's question, at least as far as CNN. Now, Murdoch-owned Fox News is a different story altogether....
Re: (Score:2)
Uuum, do you mean the same CNN that quotes random twitter comments on live television as if they were news?
Yeah, much better than FOX UnNews.
Re: (Score:2)
I see CNN stories about how FOX news mispelled something one day or put the title "congresswoman" instead of "congresman" in front of a republican's name.
CNN needs to get over not being first anymore and focus on the news.
Re:Sick? (Score:4, Insightful)
Not only do I think this is a little sick on the part of the blackhats, but it does pose some other concerns.
No real surprise there. Morality is waaaay down the Blackhat list, well below "money" and "power".
Firstly, are the media going to pick up on this and if they do, will they spin it as an opportunity to bad-mouth the Web and its communities, as well as encourage talk of "tougher rules" and the like.
Yes, and it's rather unfortunate that the media has about as much accuracy on the subject as the National Enquirer does reporting fact.
Since this is a JS vulnerability, I'd certainly like to see more discussion and thought around how seriously we take JS integration on the web and how we approach it as a core target for evil-doers to exploit. Could more be done?
Never gonna happen. Java/JRE/JS is the holy grail of environments when it comes to cross-OS integration, and it's not like other options (flash) are devoid of their vulns. Besides, it's always a risk/reward for companies, and a company will generally never take Security over Revenue.
Lastly, how are the web search engines going to react? Could more things like this call for censorship of Google, Yahoo etc; or at least more claims for 'responsibility of the search engines'?
What you're asking from the search engines would pretty much be the death of them. I'd much rather have products like AVG warn me in search engine results, or rely on better browser protection rather than censor my results.
Re:Sick? (Score:5, Informative)
Firstly, are the media going to pick up on this
I doubt it. Your computer being infected with crap isn't particularly scary.. probably because it happens so often that most people are already familiar with how un-scary (but obviously annoying) it really is. The media picks subjects that are NOT common. Man bites dog, not dog bites man. They'll continue on spreading fear about uncommon events on the internet like sexual predators and stalkers. People fear things they don't know about.
Since this is a JS vulnerability
The "javascript vulnerability" just redirects you to a known malware site. Going to a website isn't in itself much of a threat.
The real vulnerabilities (the ones that can infect your computer) exist in largely Adobe Flash, Microsoft Internet Explorer, somewhat in Adobe PDF Reader, and people just being stupid and running an executable because "the computer" told them to.
The last item is probably the hardest one to fix, and likely can't be fixed with technology (the authoritarians of the world like Kaspersky want to try to solve this through idiotic internet licensing schemes). The other three most certainly are technology problems, and can be fixed with technology. Adobe and Microsoft aren't too keen on actually fixing the problems however.
Re: (Score:2)
Not only do I think this is a little sick on the part of the blackhats
A little sick? These swine are long overdue a greeting from a gnarled set of knuckles, methinks.
Disgusting (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
As annoying as these are, a reasonable combination of browser and security suite, and some common sense, are enough to stop this from getting to be much more than that.
I find much more disgusting the websites that open up claiming to be for whatever relief aid - when in reality they're largely just sites run by crooks pocketing the money for themselves. Not just because they defraud people, but because they are poisoning the well; any indy site that really does send donations, parts of profits/proceeds of
Re: (Score:2)
As annoying as these are, a reasonable combination of browser and security suite, and some common sense, are enough to stop this from getting to be much more than that.
Please shut up. The world is not techie.
Re: (Score:2)
One needs not be an expert on home security to learn that locking one's windows and doors is a reasonable precaution, so I'm not sure how your point that not everyone is an expert is relevant. One needs not be "techie" to install Firefox and an A/V suite. We're not talking about writing your own browser and A/V, just clicking a couple of prompts. That takes no more training than learning to lock a door.
And, yes, before you use any tool, be it a power drill, a telephone, or a computer, you should familiarize
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. There should be a special kind of hell waiting for these people.
Re: (Score:1)
When criminal greed crosses the line to utter malice, it's a sign that someone needs to encounter some righteous justice. Some people just deserve a beating.
Of course, we never make mistakes in our conclusions over who the guilty party is. Advocating the use of permanent physical damage to a person's body as an acceptable judiciary solution renders impossible the reversal of the damage should new evidence ever become available, or the process itself fail in some fashion. It is for this reason that we prefer the use of federal prison, with its own set of more socially acceptable punishments for which the state is not responsible. Hint: Soap.
Re: (Score:2)
It's still news, and it's still news that matters. People are dying, others want to help, and a 3rd party tries to get in between and skim off as much as they can. The day that we no longer consider this news is the day we as a society say that this is just normal behavior.
Color me unsurprised (Score:5, Interesting)
I saw clients hit with this behavior after the Michael Jackson hit the news and with each major story since. Each time a tragedy hits I tell my girlfriend virus/spyware cleaning calls are about to pick up a bit for me. Sad but entirely predictable now.
Re:Color me unsurprised (Score:4, Informative)
It's predictable because it's automated. The technique these guys use is called 'blackhat SEO'. They have automated scripts that pull data from Google's page of search trends and automatically throw these pages up based on the search results for searches for the highest trending keywords. There's not much of a manual process behind it. If you check out the latest search trends and search for those terms, you'll see tons of malware sites showing up. It has nothing to do with what the news event or search term is. This has been going on for a while.
If there really is a hell... (Score:2, Troll)
...Satan is readying a room for these guys.
Can someone explain this to me (Score:1, Interesting)
How can a browser, via javascript on top of that, infect a computer with a virus/trojan/whatever? And can Javascript even write files to your drive?
Re:Can someone explain this to me (Score:5, Funny)
No, but your browser can show fake dialog boxes and try to trick you into downloading and installing an executable.
Google "hot russian olympic curling chicks" and try a few links, I was looking for a pic to post on another forum and it seems every second google hit has a javascript bomb attached.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
hot russian olympic curling chicks
Umm, right. Sure. Whatever floats your boat, buddy.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
NSFW
Yes [oglympics.com]
Please [oglympics.com]
Re: (Score:2)
NSFW? Seriously? I mean, some of them are nude-ish but there's no actual porn or anything. I guess it depends where you work but man, that's hardly offensive.
*wonders if he missed something worthwhile*
Heh, seriously I didn't expect anywhere near that level of attractiveness. Wow.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Looks like someone at google has noticed and is cleaning their search results. Here's one from the images.google search, which now has been "reported as an attack page".
http://images.google.ca/imgres?imgurl=http://macleans.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/wip091211_02.jpg&imgrefurl=http://piazza.cl/eew.php%3Fq%3Dcheryl-bernard-hot&usg=__C_p_BdyshgstqVmMmo-jrcjNsDM=&h=976&w=800&sz=392&hl=en&start=15&um=1&itbs=1&tbnid=5i1jhMgQhHjIwM:&tbnh=149&tbnw=122&prev=/image [google.ca]
Protection? (Score:3)
How do we protect ourselves from these malicious script websites?
(Note: I'm using the Opera X 10.10 browser.)
Kerosene isn't the right way (Score:2)
Nuke it from orbit, that's the only way to be sure.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Or run your browser in a VM and revert to a clean image each time your done browsing.
Or disable javascript in Opera, but the web will act a lot different.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Allow javascript -only- on a whitelist basis.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly this. Nothing else is rational at this point in time. Letting random sites run code on your machine *will* get you infected at some point.
(Personally I use both NoScript and FlashBlock for Firefox. With a very selective whitelist. Which pretty much prevents all attacks, unless they infect one of the few dozen sites that I have whitelisted.)
Re: (Score:1)
Disable Client-side scripting like Javascript. Don't install Flash and Silverlight plug-ins. If a website does not work, they are probably not worth the time of day.
Wake up!!! (Score:2, Informative)
This is /., right? Can we please STOP calling these FUCKTARDS hackers!!!
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
This is /., right? Can we please STOP calling these FUCKTARDS hackers!!!
Jesus, chill out man. Unless, you're known as Hacky McHackerton, President and CEO of Hacker, Inc., it probably doesn't affect YOU or your professional "creds" THAT much. Yeah, this is /., and we generally know what people mean regardless of verbage.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
AOL. The unwashed masses can call them "hackers" all they want, but the word shouldn't have that meaning here.
Same thing happend with Joannie Rochette (Score:2, Insightful)
After Joannie Rochettes short program, I googled it because I missed it. Literally the first 2 pages or so of results were 90% dummy sites with malicious payloads.
This isn't new at all. EVERY time a popular search pops up, these douchebags try to game the results to get their pages on the first page.
Watch Hawaii Tsunami Video (Score:1)
allchile.net fighting the spammers (Score:5, Informative)
I operate allchile.net, a forum for expats in Chile that has been operating for a little over 4 years. I am located in Temuco, Chile (about 100 miles south of the worst devastation) and just got my internet connection back a few hours to see all the spammers on google trying to force their way in to the position. Now me and all the other established sites in Chile, with real history and connections to know what is going on in Chile are fighting the Google spammers to try and get people in touch with their missing relatives and get news out to the World about the distaster.
If you have a web site, and want to help us, link to the real sites about Chile. Even Facebook, twitter, and CNN are in a way in our way. They will be all chatting up the topic for a week or two more, then they will be gone. Our sites will still have to fight back up to the top of Google while trying to assist with the reconstruction.
My sites and my friends sites (all run by people on the ground in the disaster by the way):
http://www.allchile.net/ [allchile.net]
http://www.allsouthernchile.com/ [allsouthernchile.com]
http://www.santiagoradio.cl/ [santiagoradio.cl]
http://www.thepulse.cl/ [thepulse.cl]
http://www.spencerglobal.com/ [spencerglobal.com]
I put on my robe and grammar Nazi hat. (Score:2)
It is difficult to tell whether this particular page was SEO-optimized...
Search engine optimization-optimized?
Lost in the next tsunami? (Score:2)
What if the people who did this mysteriously disappears the next time there is a tsunami, even if they are far inland? Would anyone actually bother looking for them?
Search engines need malware detection (Score:2)
Incidents like this are a good reason for search engine operators like Google to add malware detection to their systems, refuse to index such pages, and actively blacklist the hosts (by dropping them entirely from the index or from the search results) until the problem is fixed.
It is probably also a good idea to penalize pages with clearly dodgy (if not malicious) javascript in terms of page rank as well.