Facebook Has Reached Its Microsoft Bing Moment -- History Shows the Results Won't Be Pretty (cnbc.com) 150
As we noted recently, Facebook continues to duplicate every core feature that rival app Snapchat adds to its service. A new report, which cites multiple Facebook employees, sheds more light into how Facebook operates. The company, the report claims, created a "Teens Team" to figure out how to grab teenagers back from Snapchat, and has been up front about its tactics within the company: The internal mantra among some groups is "don't be too proud to copy." Matt Rosoff, an editor at CNBC says this whole tactics by Facebook is nothing new in the tech industry. From the article: Flash back to the early 2000s, when Microsoft was the undisputed king of the tech industry, with two unassailable monopolies -- operating systems and productivity apps for personal computers. It faced a lot of competitors, but the one that scared it the most was Google, which was in a completely different business. Google didn't start by creating alternatives to Windows and Office, although it did so later. Instead, it created a suite of online services -- first search, followed by email and maps -- that threatened the entire purpose of a personal computer. Why rely on Microsoft software running locally when you could get so much done with web apps? Microsoft's response? Trying to build the exact same service that made Google famous -- a search engine, first known as MSN Search, later rebranded to Bing. Eleven years later, Bing is a small minority player in search, with less than 10 percent market share on the desktop and less than 1 percent in mobile.
Bing? (Score:2, Informative)
Best porn image search engine there is. Beat that, Google!
Re: (Score:2)
I stopped looking for celebrity nudes on Google. Even with safe-search off, it seems they've become high-minded.
Re: (Score:2)
And that tells me that you are into necrophilia.
Re: (Score:1)
Hey, it's not like he's taken a selfie with your mom...yet...
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly.
They are comparing Facebook to Microsoft's Bing, but you could just as easily compare them to Microsoft's DOS, Windows, or Office.
Anyone remember Zynga? (Score:1)
Ironic that Facebook isn't learning lessons from the masters of copying ideas.
Re:Anyone remember Zynga? (Score:5, Interesting)
No not really. There are also many instances where copying a competitors product became widely successful.
VisiCalc to Lotus 123 to Excel
WordPerfect to Word
MySpace to Facebook
I can keep going but There are many companies who just happens to get their version at the right time and market to the right group of people to make their obvious copy the more successful product.
Re: (Score:3)
There are also many instances where copying a competitors product became widely successful.
And that can happen without even killing the original, which is smart, because you can copy from it multiple times: Mac to Windows PC.
Re: (Score:2)
I can keep going but There are many companies who just happens to get their version at the right time and market to the right group of people to make their obvious copy the more successful product.
So how do you know which will succeed and which will fail?
I only have a sample size of two teenagers (plus their friends), and it's Snapchat 2, FB 0 here. So it appears to be a fail from where I sit.
Re: (Score:3)
The first versions of Word I used in late 80s were keystroke compatible with WordPerfect and would read and write WP format files by default. It was close enough for most companies. Many of my customers went to word because it was much cheaper than WordPerfect (competitive upgrade pricing). Law firms were the hold outs that would not switch and also used more advanced WP features that were not copied. By the time Windows 95 came out WP for Windows was buggy as hell and Word was pretty stable. Law firms that
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes copying is working, sometime it isn't.
But either you are proactive or you are reactive in the market. Being stuck on reactive use means that you will always be behind and as soon as you have caught up with the competition the customers have already moved elsewhere.
Thank god! (Score:1)
I use MySpace, so I avoided all this drama.
Re: (Score:2)
I use Diaspora, which has the added advantage of being nice and quiet. Peace and quiet is so soothing...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Thank god! (Score:5, Funny)
I use Diaspora, which has the added advantage of being nice and quiet. Peace and quiet is so soothing...
My friends and I all switched to Diaspora,
but then we just went our separate ways...
Re: (Score:2)
All of this has happened before and will happen again.
Re: (Score:2)
The interesting part of all this is that Bing was created not because Microsoft wanted to be in the search business - but because search was lucrative enough for Google to allow them to grow into a threat to Microsoft's core OS and Office monopolies. Bing is there to cut Google down to size more than to build up Microsoft. And, to the extent that Google actually had ambitions to take Microsoft head on, I guess they were right. Though who knows - if Microsoft hand never tried to damage Google's revenue st
Re: (Score:2)
The interesting part of all this is that Bing was created not because Microsoft wanted to be in the search business - but because search was lucrative enough for Google to allow them to grow into a threat to Microsoft's core OS and Office monopolies. Bing is there to cut Google down to size more than to build up Microsoft. And, to the extent that Google actually had ambitions to take Microsoft head on, I guess they were right. Though who knows - if Microsoft hand never tried to damage Google's revenue stream, maybe Google never would've gone after Windows and Office. But the Google guys were nothing if not ambitious.
You could also make the point that Android was more an attempt to keep Microsoft from buying their way into mobile search than any kind of attempt to take on Apple. But all these companies counting on network effects to maintain near monopolies seem to have to take on all comers. Monopoly power, for all the head start it gives you, are not invincible.
No... just, no... Google has never been a threat to Microsoft's OS. Their mobile division, definitely, but never their OS division. As far as Office goes, they have been a minor pest, at best, with their email service. Google did win the search war and they have had huge success with mobile, but have had a hard time turning Android into anything resembling the financial returns that Apple is getting from their mobile business.
As for any comparison between Facebook and Bing, it falls down on it's lack o
Re: (Score:2)
Google has never been a threat to Microsoft's OS. Their mobile division, definitely, but never their OS division.
What about all the people (younger folks especially) who are no longer buying/using desktop computers since their phones do everything they need?
Re: (Score:1)
When they get real jobs they'll find they can no longer do what they need on their phones.
Re: (Score:1)
What about all the people (younger folks especially) who are no longer buying/using desktop computers since their phones do everything they need?
I love watching young people spend 10 minutes to send 2 messages back and forth.
Re: (Score:1)
No... just, no... Google has never been a threat to Microsoft's OS.
Absolutely. Google's reach into search and web definitely threatened MS's business models. There's a reason MS hasn't really had success growing into any new related market that's opened up. Web - dead. Mobile - dead. Tablets - dead. Worse, email and documents are moving away from MS, because they no longer control the majority of devices people use to view and edit them with. They now have to be compatible with other OSes and apps, and if not, their market share will continue to shrink.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Did I miss the boat? (Score:2)
So I still don't have a facebook account.... can I stop wondering do I or don't I?
Re: (Score:2)
So I still don't have a facebook account...
I know that's very "hip" to say, but I'll bet you're a liar.
Re:Did I miss the boat? (Score:5, Funny)
I didn't have a facebook account before it was cool!
Re: (Score:2)
I had a facebook account to play farmville. Actually... I had 5 facebook accounts to play farmville.
And then one day facebook wanted to nail down who I really was. And I stopped using facebook.
That must have been over 5 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
I had 5 facebook accounts to play farmville.
Wow.
Re: (Score:3)
Why? I don't have a facebook account either. Nor does my wife. Admittedly I don't know many people who don't have a facebook account, but there are some of us out there!
On the other hand, my teenagers do have facebook accounts, but they don't use them anymore. They and their friends have fully moved over to other social media platforms and openly mock anyone who does use facebook.
Re:Did I miss the boat? (Score:4, Interesting)
So I still don't have a facebook account.... can I stop wondering do I or don't I?
If you don't have a facebook account, facebook still has an account on you. Opening the account is the only way to get control of privacy settings to limit what facebook publishes of personal data on you.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes really [technologyreview.com]. Every website that has a like button has facebooks tendrils in it. If you don't have an explicit sign-in, a random ID is associated with you and they keep track of your browsing habits (every page you visit that you can like). Once you create an account and sign-in, then that random ID is associated with the real you, and you get some semblance of control.
Of course, you are the product for Facebook, so *control* is a very vague, loosely defined term.
Re: (Score:2)
do I or don't I?
Ok, you're "that guy". When you get a Facebook account, it will reach the tipping point and implode. So please, get a Facebook account.
Re:Did I miss the boat? (Score:4, Informative)
According to my teenagers and their friends it already has imploded. They simply don't use it anymore. They've move on to other social media platforms. If you are cool, you don't use facebook.
Re: (Score:3)
It's cute that teenagers still think they're the centre of the world, meanwhile Facebook is moving on from pure social networking and starting to absorb special interest groups from blogs, forums and mailing lists.
Re: (Score:2)
Except teenagers won't always be teenagers. One of my kids is in college and the other will be starting college next year. They have friends on social media all over the country and none of their friends use facebook anymore. This is the next generation of adults who are eschewing facebook.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Makes me laugh actually, hind sight being 20/20 and all that, I did not realize that school wasn't all that bad in comparison to the hamster wheel that is work. They can't wait to get out of
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't seen a drop in facebook, just a new generation that has no interest in starting it.
And can you blame them? The one rule of social networking is don't be on the same social network as your parents. Facebook reaching such critical mass is exactly its own undoing.
Who cares. (Score:2)
Or maybe it's the other way around? Maybe all these little nothing apps want to be Facebook?
Seriously, why is there a;; this bitterness when Facebook adds a totally obvious feature that some Wannabe IPO thought they had exclusive rights to? Please...
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure there was a precedent back when Microsoft went to make a web browser in the 1990s...
Re: (Score:3)
There are success stories too (Score:3)
Waste of time (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
...and by then they'll be using something else (maybe).
When I was a teenager, BBS (and if you were lucky and your parents had a uni account, IRC and NNTP) was about as close as you could get to a social network.
But, old people stuff aside, look at progression here: NNTP, IRC, basic web forums, ICQ groups, PHPNuke forums, MySpace, Facebook, Snapchat, ...?
(or similar, YMMV.)
Odds are perfect someone else may come out with yet another means to communicate in groups by the time today's teenagers are old enough to drink.
Re: (Score:2)
Teens have zero money.
Except the ones who get an allowance.
Or ones who get lots of checks from relatives for birthdays/holidays.
Or have part-time jobs*
Or are part of rich families that will buy them whatever they want.
* -- personal anecdote: I started working in some form at the age of eleven, and was employed continuously until I lost a job in my 20's.
Re: (Score:2)
You monetize the platform.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apples to Oranges (Score:5, Informative)
Eleven years later, Bing is a small minority player in search, with less than 10 percent market share on the desktop and less than 1 percent in mobile.
The summary appears to imply that Bing went from being a major player to a small player in the search engine market. Bing has always been a minority player. The reality is that the 10 percent market share represents growth, considering that Bing was a non-existent presence in the market 11 years ago, so the analogy is fatally flawed.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
A more appropriate analogy would be Hotmail vs Gmail. And yes, Microsoft didn't go down without a fight, but their fight just wasn't anywhere near being good enough.
Re: (Score:1)
Hotmail's anti-spam features paled in comparison to GMail. I think that's a big reason Hotmail went down.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So... what's the other name? I honestly don't know anyone who doesn't use gmail or a work email address.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
still has in excess of 400 million active users.
I can back that up. I probably have created 2 dozen accounts there each year for close to 2 decades when ever some stupid site wants me to register so I can see or buy some stupid thing. Repeat the next time I want to see or buy something.
Re: (Score:2)
really REALLY bad comparison, at last count Hotmail/outlook accounts still outnumbered gmail accounts, and that is with gmail being forced on many android users.
Whatever figures you're using probably are based on either throwaway accounts or contact information that just hasn't been updated in 20 years. Likewise, the loss of geocities must have been a huge setback for Microsoft.
But those Snapchat users *aren't* coming back! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
In percentage and absolute terms, Google is more profitable than Microsoft, which "only" earned $17B net income on $85B sales.
Facebook, though, kept 37% of it's $27.6B last year. If this is the future, then FB will be raking in the cash for decades to come.
File this is the, they just don't get it category (Score:3)
The company, the report claims, created a "Teens Team" to figure out how to grab teenagers back from Snapchat,
In related news, an "Ex's" group is created and meets to figure out how to lure back the person that left them. Reports indicate that candy and presents will play a predominant role.
Let's see, I'm a teen, my parents and relatives are all on Facebook and I'm going to actively use the platform why?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This. Every change to Facebook, and in particular to the iOS app, seems to make it a little bit harder to either get to the chronological or view, or to stay there. I couldn't care less about what's "hot", I want to see what's been posted since last time I looked.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have no idea what you are talking about. Google maps loads instantly for me. It doesn't do much beyond map related functions, so I'm not sure where you are getting "bloated" from.
Re: (Score:2)
How many others of you have noticed how Google Maps has gone from something relatively useful, to the bloated piece of crap that it is now, which takes a geologic age to load or really do anything, even on a fast computer with a fast internet connection?
Yep. I think a lot of the google stuff is designed based on the idea that everyone has gigabit ethernet to use on their bus based commute, with a side order of the Apple style of you're a right old saddo if you don't upgrade your computer often enough.
Snap what? (Score:2)
Look, no matter how much you talk it up, it's not a thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Am I mistaken or didn't Facebook buy Snapchat? How can Snapchat be Facebook's rival app if Facebook owns Snapchat?
Facebook offered to buy Snapchat for a reported $3B but the offer was rejected by Snapchat CEO...
Re: (Score:1)
Good tactics based on game theory (Score:1)
But really Facebook's approach is the right one based on game theory. When you're in a race and you're behind (like Snapchat is in user base), it's in your best interests to innovate to try to make up the distance. When you're ahead, it's in your best interest to maintain the status quo, and do exactly what your rivals do so that you maintain your lead while minimizi
Re: (Score:2)
Last I checked... (Score:1)
It worked for them with Netscape didn't it? (Score:1)
As I recall, (and somebody can correct me if I'm misremembering), when Netscape came out with their browser, Microsoft pooh-poohed the whole thing publicly while scrambling to put together Internet Explorer. Employees at Netscape were really worried about Microsoft with good reason. Then Microsoft bundled IE with their OS so naturally users of MS automatically started using it, and that was the end of Netscape, the innovator.
Press Fast Forward (Score:2)
Disrespect your users, and they will flee (Score:2)
The issue with Microsoft, Facebook, and increasingly, Google, is that they have no intention of respecting their users. People feel locked in to Windows and Office, and would gladly jump ship due to Microsoft's abusive attitude, if only they could. Network effects keep a lot of customers stuck there. If people felt good about Microsoft, they'd use Bing and be happy.
The same goes for Facebook. They could have treated their users (note I don't say "customers") well, and they wouldn't face such a challenge fro
Zune (Score:2)
When will Bing run on my Zune?
Bing?? lol (Score:2)
Bing is still up and running?
Re: (Score:1)
Didn't you hear his xmas song with David Bowie?
Comparing essential tool to making funny faces (Score:2)
Without a search/directory tool, much of the web we want to access is inaccessible.
Original post compares this to a photo-swapping app that allows you to put cats ears on people, as if that's somehow a commercial threat.
Now either Snapchat thinks Slashdotters are a viable market for their nonsense and are chucking Bizx a bundle for fake content... or one of the editors really likes those cat ears.
Sometimes Less is More (Score:2)
While the desktop FB client is relatively free from the Snapchat nonsense the phone app is becoming horribly cluttered. Seemingly everyday a new "feature" is added that takes away from the core FB concept and relegates that screen real estate to functionality the FB client is not seeking.
In short, FB is running the very real risk of alienating adult users who simply do not care about all of shiny objects and prefer simplicity in their lives.
Steve Jobs (Score:1)
Facebook is not a social network ... (Score:2)
... it's a global mental illness.
That aside, we all know that what Facebook does should be a regular Internet protocol and service and not some commercial website. The only reason FB took off and still is going strong is because E-Mail and Usenet and to some extent IRC are so very shitty and we, the Inet and FOSS community haven't built a viable modern communication service yet.
And no, Diaspora is an implementation of a non-service and not really a replacement. Yet.
Once a protocol and service that does what
Ironicly (Score:1)
SC are trying to be a social networking company now and FB is trying to be an image sharing service.
Re: (Score:1)
The difference with Microsoft is the monopolistic power they got because IBM adopted their OS for the IBM PC.
It is a complicated story, and there are a lot of questionable anecdotes about it, such as how Gary Kilmer, who wrote CP/M was out flying when IBM execs came around to see him, and the execs were miffed enough to go with Microsoft. Or the story that Bill Gates' Mom was on some charitable committee and heard from an IBM exec on the same committee that IBM was looking for an OS.
The IBM PC was an overp
my first diss (Score:2)
The keyboard was indestructible. The case was a tank. The monochrome monitor displayed 25 rows of 80 columns, including upper and lower case letters.
Re: (Score:1)
I heard a similar story about Gates copying at least some of his basic interpreter from somewhere else. Don't remember where for sure, but I think it was supposed to be Heathkit. Anyway, the anonymous coward is right to point out that it's not proven. One would probably have to look at the source code of various sources to do that, and who is going to bother with that now. I would like to know because if he did, it would reveal a lot of hypocrisy on Gates' part since he fumed so much over any sort of pi
Re: (Score:2)
That's bullshit for a lot of reasons, starting with "duh all communication can be used for cheating" and going to "millennials actually hook up less frequently than their parents' did."
Re: (Score:1)