Ask Toolbar Now Considered Malware By Microsoft 212
AmiMoJo writes: Last month Microsoft changed its policy on protecting search settings to include any software that attempts to hijack searches as malware. As a result, this month the Ask Toolbar, which most people will probably recognize as being unwanted crapware bundled with Java, was marked as malware and will now be removed by Microsoft's security software built in to Windows 7 and above.
bundle (Score:5, Funny)
Re:bundle (Score:5, Informative)
Re:bundle (Score:5, Informative)
That is something Minecraft developers could have done years ago. The binary license of the JRE allows it to be bundled with an application for private use of that application.
When redistributing the JRE on Microsoft Windows as a private application runtime (not accessible by other applications) with a custom launcher, the following files are also optional. These are libraries and executables that are used for Java support in Internet Explorer and Mozilla family browsers; these files are not needed in a private JRE redistribution.
from the Java 8 README [oracle.com]
Re: bundle (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They should've used Excelsior JET instead.
Re:bundle (Score:5, Funny)
This article is useless without a video of the director of Ask Software, five seconds after he heard the news.
Good fucking riddance.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Java will never be removed. However the plugin model used by Java (NPAPI) is being phased out completely, so that it won't even run on browsers. The same can be said for Flash and Shockwave plugins using that same NPAPI plugin model.
It hurts right now, but like going to the doctor to remove a big tumor, short term pain results in a healthier system.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So, like dumping Windows then!
Re: (Score:2)
will java be also removed since it's bundeled with ask toolbar?
Avast tells me a couple of times a week that my GWT Developer plugin is a virus even though I tell it every time to ignore the warning and allow the plugin to run.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not far wrong. GWT is a plague, even if it's not technically malware per se.
What would be the preferable technology to use instead of GWT?
Re:bundle (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm hoping they will automatically uninstall Chrome as well, since it somehow manages to reinstall itself surreptitiously so often. So many third party programs will install it during an update if you're not paying attention to which boxes to uncheck; and I know every time I go visit my mother she'll be asking about what this Chrome thing is and how to get rid of it. Most often it's the anti-malware software that puts that shit there, which is ironic since I consider anything being installed without my explicit permission to be malware. It should get rid of googlebar or whatever that's called, and all other opt-out software.
Re: (Score:2)
Just tell her to use it and you'll stop getting support calls.
Re: (Score:2)
Remove execution permission for the Chrome executables and throw the icon into the garbage bin?
Re: (Score:2)
Ask Toolbar is no Longer bundled with Java.
It's Bundled with Yahoo now.
Not sure if McAfee Security Scan is still in the mix.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
how about removing that nag-ware that reminds to update java version, can't disable in 64 bit. Some people require a certain java version for their work.....
Hmm (Score:2, Funny)
I feel there's a word that's appropriate... hypo... hypocr.... oh, MS Word told me the word I'm looking for is "hyper". Yep, what a bunch of hypers.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Yup. The effing bing bar is something I delete on a weekly basis from several machines. Granted it's also stupid user syndrome.
Re:Hmm (Score:4, Interesting)
What is the smallest browser space you have ever seen remaining? Once at a friends house I asked to use the internet and half the screen vertically plus around 1/10 horizontally was taken up by various "toolbars". I'd never even seen a horizontal one before that day.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Interesting)
I experience that with my wife. She's got a reasonably nice desktop for doing what she does (nothing important) but complains it runs slow. It was screaming fast once upon a time, so I go and run and rerun all the anti-virus software and malware removers, remove have the extensions that have installed themselves, reboot a few times in the process, and it's screaming fast again. The most toolbars I've counted was at least 6, and the search is almost always stuck on something undesirable.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Funny)
The most toolbars I've counted was at least 6
Amateur [noahcoad.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Oh man I remember that AltaVista bar. I really really liked that one. That was the one and only useful search bar. It was useful not only because back in the day AltaVista was the best search engine but also because of the translate button which is the only reason I still use AltaVista from time to time and a pretty damn good ad blocker.
Wow (Score:2)
other than looking for a better husband.
Re: (Score:2)
Bought my wife a Chromebook. Haven't looked back (or had to do the above) since.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, Google does an excellent job of ensuring they're the only ones tracking your web behavior and feeding you ads.
Re: (Score:2)
My wife seems to be pretty good about avoiding those kinds of issues. What she does instead though is open every dumblink that she might possibly want to read later in a new tab or window. But then she apparently never goes back and reads any of it, or reads them and leaves them open for referencing from latter. She complains about her computer slowing down and I go look at it and she'll have dozens of tabs and windows going all at once.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've managed to get the browser window as small as 128x96 with a fuckton of toolbars and BHOs.
Re: (Score:2)
I installed the Nuke Anything firefox extension specifically to (semi-manually) remove huge bars, though that may take a bit many clicks.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. The effing bing bar is something I delete on a weekly basis from several machines. Granted it's also stupid user syndrome.
At issue is the fact that by using the Ask.com toolbar, you give click profit to Ask.com instead of Microsoft through the Bing toolbar. I question the legality of declaring something malware because it eats into your competing products profits.
Re:Hmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
You make a valid point but laws only matter if they are enforced.
Flashback time (Score:5, Insightful)
Anything that installs a toolbar in your browser is malware.
Re:Flashback time (Score:5, Informative)
When people called me, having trouble with their browsers, and there were about 15 or more toolbars taking up their entire screen. And ask was always there, sometime multiple times. Anything that installs a toolbar in your browser is malware.
Ditto. That's usually one of the first questions I ask, and most people have no idea how it even got on their machine. I tell them "they aren't giving you this toolbar to be nice, they're giving it to you so they can control your searches and sell you stuff."
Re:Flashback time (Score:4, Interesting)
What got them in the end was that they screwed with the user's search settings. Toolbars are a supported feature of Internet Explorer, but apps are not supposed to screw up search settings in the registry.
Doing so generates warning prompts on Windows, but because the user was already clicking through those to install Java they probably didn't notice an extra one for Ask.
That's bullshit (Score:4, Funny)
Everybody I know has multiple toolbars on their internet. None of them has problems with malware. I even specifically asked the ask toolbar whether or not it was malware, and it said (and I quote) "that's ridiculous".
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Flashback time (Score:5, Insightful)
Are you serious? How can you survive in today's World Wide Web environment without a tailored toolbar experience that sends all your input and browsing data to its publisher? Ask and you shall receive.
Funny, I thought that was Google's business model.
Re:Flashback time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Flashback time (Score:4, Interesting)
I would tweak what you said to: "Google is mind bogglingly popular because its search results USED TO BE not dictated by short-sighted bean counters, and then market inertia now that they are".
I switched away from Google about a year ago because I was finally fed up with lousy result quality. My specific complaint is that Google ended its long-ago policy that every result contains every search term exactly as given. Wow, that was useful, but now Google just tries to guess what you want. That's nice and all, but if you think I'm a dumb user, then show me results for what I actually searched for and then make a suggestion about a search you think would be better. But just straight up giving me results that I didn't search for? No thanks, I switched.
Re: (Score:3)
This. So much. Google used to be run by the engineers. These days the engineers are run by Google. They earned their place at the top, but they're actively sabotaging themselves with the various moves they're making, such as the one you cited. I tried DuckDuckGo last year and was unimpressed at the time. I tried again a few months ago and found it to be much better than before, so I went ahead and switched all of my devices over. The only two things I miss from Google Search are map results when I search fo
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think Google is that horrible. Even with Google+, I don't think Vic Gundotra is a bean counter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Flashback time (Score:4, Insightful)
And it's not an ADDITIONAL search bar on top of the actual browser. If Google forced "Google Toolbar" down your throat, we'd have an apple-to-apple comparison.
There's a difference between using a built in search engine (with the ability to change it to Bing, if your heart desires)... and getting a search engine - and extra crap - installed without your knowledge.
We all know the average idiot doesn't know how to avoid getting tricked into installing it - and Ask and other companies go FAR out of their way to discourage saying no. It takes actual effort to not get dinged.
You can argue about how evil Google is... but they aren't acting like Ask does.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It was convenient, because it added a bunch of features to IE. As you said, it added a search box to IE long before URL-bar searching was a thing, but it also allowed search term highlighting, a popup blocker, form auto-fill, in-browser spellcheck, etc. All of this is built-in to web browsers today, but back in the day, the Google Toolbar was legitimately useful.
Re: Flashback time (Score:4, Insightful)
Yes. Google had a tool bar, no one is contesting that; but was it forced down your throat by google? If you downloaded any google software, did you have to specifically uncheck a box to not have it installed, or did you have to explicitly click on a link that said "Get the google toolbar" that was more than a few lines below the "Google Search" and "I'm Feeling Lucky" buttons where you couldn't accidentally miss the button by a few pixels to click on the link? If I remember right, it fit more the latter case I presented.
That's a lot different from putting a checkbox with 8pt Text in a 12pt body that you have to find and uncheck to prevent the installer from automatically installing the toolbar.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes. Google had a tool bar, no one is contesting that; but was it forced down your throat by google? If you downloaded any google software, did you have to specifically uncheck a box to not have it installed, or did you have to explicitly click on a link that said "Get the google toolbar" that was more than a few lines below the "Google Search" and "I'm Feeling Lucky" buttons where you couldn't accidentally miss the button by a few pixels to click on the link? If I remember right, it fit more the latter case I presented.
That's a lot different from putting a checkbox with 8pt Text in a 12pt body that you have to find and uncheck to prevent the installer from automatically installing the toolbar.
When I download free windows software I very often have to check "Do not install Chrome". They are bundling it with all kinds of things now to force it on everybody.
Re: (Score:2)
So your bitch is with Adobe, not Google. This is the apples to apples comparison that wernercd was mentioning.
People have a problem with Oracle's method of having Oracle's Java installation include an opt-out download of the Ask Toolbar which is known to be malware and very difficult to uninstall through traditional methods.
People have a problem with Adobe's method of having Adobe's Flash installation include an opt-out download of the Google Toolbar which is known to be spyware and fairly easy to uninstal
Re:Flashback time (Score:4, Interesting)
This is 2015. You don't need toolbars to do all that. Simply use Chrome and stay logged into your GMail, Hotmail, Facebook and Twitter accounts.
One down... (Score:5, Funny)
1,753,378 to go.
Too little, too tale (Score:4, Insightful)
Great, but how about marking as malware every bundled software that come with an installer? It doesn't seem complicated to me, it I install SomeProgram.exe then any other software unrelated to SomeProgram.exe should be marked as malware and removed.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Great, but how about marking as malware every bundled software that come with an installer? It doesn't seem complicated to me, it I install SomeProgram.exe then any other software unrelated to SomeProgram.exe should be marked as malware and removed.
I think if you do it right you're correct. There could be a legitimate case of one program relying on another that this would screw up.
Pop up message. I see you just installed someprogram.exe at the same time weirdprogram.exe also installed. Do you want to keep weirdprogram?
Ahhh... Toolbars! (Score:5, Informative)
I always remember this [linux-noob.com] image of IE7 stuffed with toolbars. A similar test was done on Windows XP [linux-noob.com].
In the case of IE7, this was done as a test to see if the reset function would work correctly. It did. [windows-noob.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I always assumed that (Score:5, Funny)
Now that Android is taking over the personal OS landscape, and PC sales are dropping, MS doesn't gain as much as they used to, and now actually feels the pain from allowing this to happen, they decide to remove them.
It's hard to imagine, but (Score:5, Insightful)
at this pace, within a couple years I'll like Microsoft more than I like Mozilla.
Re: (Score:2)
Late is not ideal, but it's still better than never.
Good (Score:5, Insightful)
Good. It is malware. I can't think of a browser toolbar that I wouldn't consider to be malware to some degree. Has anyone in the past 5 years intentionally installed one of those things? My impression is that they only ever get installed because someone wasn't paying enough attention when they installed some crappy piece of software, and it was bundled in.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. (Score:3)
I've seen people install the Google toolbar because they thought that was how to use Google... I've removed it a lot as well.
Whack a mole (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree with you in principle, I'm not sure what's wrong with the example you gave. I found the download is about 2 seconds. There's a link called "Download" in the navigation bar that leads you to mirrors, right at the top with one saying "Provided by ImgBurn". Pretty standard and clean.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I get the same page both with and without AdBlock for Chrome. And I agree, this site isn't a good example of tricky download links.
All toolbars are malware? (Score:2)
All toolbars are malware, what is the big deal. I took user install rights away, because of toolbars. They were just causing to many problems.
That'll annoy Oracle (Score:5, Insightful)
Annoying Oracle can't be a bad thing. I can't believe they bundle it when Java is needed for so many enterprise apps - surely the reputational damage is worth more than the revenue from bundling the toolbar? It makes them look cheap and certainly not enterprise.
So yeah, good for Microsoft. They're doing some good things these days. Perhaps a bit like IBM when they were knocked off of their perch, MS now realise they need to actually produce good products and play nicer with customers.
Re:That'll annoy Oracle (Score:5, Informative)
Annoying Oracle can't be a bad thing. I can't believe they bundle it when Java is needed for so many enterprise apps - surely the reputational damage is worth more than the revenue from bundling the toolbar? It makes them look cheap and certainly not enterprise.
If you download the "server" JRE (actually it's a full JDK, I don't know why they label it that way), it comes as a simple tarball. It doesn't interact with the registry, doesn't install the browser plugin -- it's just full JDK distribution. I'm guessing they are locked into a multi-year co-marketing deal with Ask for the consumer distribution. I always just download the server version, unzip, and add C:\jdk1.x.y_z to my PATH and I'm done.
Re:That'll annoy Oracle (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I can only deduce that Oracle is under some sort of licensing agreement with Ask that was written back when Java belonged to Sun. An agreement that forces them to bundle in the Ask toolbar with Java downloads. Anything other than that makes Oracle look really bad. I could see if Oracle was giving away their software for free and Ask was some sort of way for them to pay the bills. But that is hardly the case here.
Come on Oracle - ditch the cheesy toolbar. Let's all be adult about this.
Re: (Score:2)
/ task scheduler / windows / setup / gwx /
disable the tasks and kill the tray icon in the task manager.
What I Consider Malware (Score:2)
YOUR INTRUSIVE WINDOWS UPDATE!
The latest batch of updates magically moved Microsoft Office Upload Center startup configuration from msconfig/regedit entries TO THE DAMN TASK SCHEDULER! WTF?!
</rant>
I praise them for the rare use case where they use this intrusive omni-present program for good. This is four times, that I remember, in the last year that they have done a sweeping removal of malware with Windows Update
Re: (Score:3)
The task scheduler is the preferred method for launching tasks now.It's a robust unified interface with logging capabilities and error handling.
I can see the old registry entries being ignored in the future with the ability for the OS to detect and create tasks when an installer tries to write to them.
Yay. (Score:4, Insightful)
Ask finally got what it's been asking for all along
Next up - McAffee.
Then Java, then Ffflash. I can see we're gunna need a longer wall. And maybe a conveyor belt.
Re: (Score:2)
Die SiteAdvisor! Die! (and stay dead!)
Irony (Score:2)
What took so long? (Score:2)
SourceForge (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
This is not malware (Score:2)
Like watching two rabid dogs fighting. (Score:2)
Ask isn't removed (Score:3)
It looks like this only applies to older versions of the Ask toolbar. According to the link in the post, "The latest version of this application is not detected by our objective criteria, and is not considered unwanted software."
I do hope that their "objective criteria" will help to keep the Ask toolbar from being quite as annoying as it was, however.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I've never seen the Bing toolbar bundled with anything (including any Microsoft products). As far as I can tell, it's a 100% opt-in manual download.
Re: Antitrust? (Score:3, Informative)
For me, it came with both Skype and DirectX. Few other things I can't remember before that. A quick Google search reveals that it comes with a lot of things.
Re: (Score:3)
HP printer drivers are amazing, in the sense that 100+ meg of wares is installed when it only takes tens of kilobytes to actually drive a fucking printer. I mean Jesus Quincy Christ impaled on a stick with roman military nails, what in the hell?
Re:Antitrust? (Score:4, Insightful)
No, because the restricted behavior isn't bundling, it's changing search providers without prompting.
It's mentioned in the article in about every single sentence, so I can see how you missed it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Office upload center (Score:5, Insightful)
The main issue *I* have with it, is that when I disable it - You know... I like to disable stuff I don't use - it refuses to stay disabled.
There are schedules, and protection tasks, and all sorts of other asshatery that will keep that process running. That's what you would normally call malware - something that refuses to stay disabled or removed.
Re:Bing toolbar! (Score:4, Informative)
The Bing toolbar doesn't change search settings without prompting, and is not removed. Same with the Google toolbar.
Re:My question (Score:5, Informative)
He's not talking about Microsoft's antivirus/antimalware, he's talking about the 'malicious software removal' that's part of Windows Update even if you don't have MS's AV installed.
It removes a very few specific things that can be difficult to get rid of.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The monthly MSRT is like the McAfee "Stinger" tool. It's a one-shot, foreground-only malware removal tool that gets replaced with an entirely new copy of the program every so often.
MSRT just runs automatically as part of Windows Update. Stinger requires you to go download it and run it manually.
Also, MSRT has undocumented API access beyond anyone else's capabilities, and a short enough support window to make it worthwhile to use undocumented API's. It wouldn't surprise me to know that MSRT does all kinds of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And make sure it does not install itself in the first place without your explicit opt-in permission. Otherwise I consider it malware.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are but when you use them, you find you actually want more from a browser