French Court Frowns On Autocomplete, Tells Google To Remove Searches 343
New submitter Lexx Greatrex writes with this excerpt from Ars Technica: "Google had been sued by insurance company Lyonnaise de Garantie, which was offended by search results including the word 'escroc,' meaning crook, according to a story posted Tuesday by the Courthouse News Service. 'Google had argued that it was not liable since the word, added under Google Suggest, was the result of an automatic algorithm and did not come from human thought,' the article states. 'A Paris court ruled against Google, however, pointing out that the search engine ignored requests to remove the offending word... In addition to the fine, Google must also remove the term from searches associated with Lyonnaise de Garantie.'"
What if... (Score:5, Funny)
Can it be added back in later if we find out that they really are crooks?
Re:What if... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Simple Solution (Score:5, Funny)
Whenever French users search for "Lyonnaise de Garantie," Google should just return "Your search - Lyonnaise de Garantie - did not match any documents." And then a list of competing insurance companies.
There! Problem solved!
Did you really mean Mayonnaise?
Purely my opinion (Score:5, Funny)
I don't know whether Lyonnaise de Garantie are crooks [lyonnaise-...rantie.com], but I do know that they tried to censor the web to remove any association between Lyonnaise de Garantie [lyonnaise-...rantie.com] and crooks [lyonnaise-...rantie.com], or as the French say, Lyonnaise de Garantie [lyonnaise-...rantie.com] and escroc [lyonnaise-...rantie.com]. Which is interesting. I wonder what Ms Streisand in her lovely beach house has to say about it all.
P.S. (Score:3, Funny)
By the way, I forgot to mention this in the last post, but Samuel Miller, the DOJ prosecutor who went after Microsoft also considers them a monopoly [cnn.com]. So your statement about Microsoft is somewhat amusing in restrospect.
Re:troll post (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Whatever happened to Quaero? (Score:3, Funny)
It surrendered. Duh.
Re:Censorship. (Score:2, Funny)
Clearly you need to sue Goggle/Apple!
Lyonnaise de Garantie don't 'get' the Intarwebz (Score:5, Funny)
In my opinion, the French firm Lyonnaise de Garantie [lyonnaise-...rantie.com] to a man, are worse than crooks. They are the most foul and debase degenerates, slime of the lowest order. Fuck them, they are pox on the world and a waste of air. To call them a pack of worthless cunts would bring shame to roving packs of worthless cunts. Jean-Luc Berho, the VP of the company cannot bring himself to orgasm without unless he chokes a dog to death. Jean-Jacques Olivié, the president of that slithering pack of reptilians, cannot be trusted not to accidentally choke himself to death if left unattended with a stale croissant. May he catch syphilis from a drunken Armenian mule. Insurance frauds could learn something from these thieves, as could lamprey and other tubular blood sucking vermin.
But, hey, I could be wrong. After all, it is just an opinion.
Re:What if... (Score:2, Funny)
They can just get it removed. You should refer them as the company that sued google because people were referring to them as crooks. [lyonnaise-...rantie.com].
Which is absolutely 100% true.