To be honest I don't find this story at all surprising. I mean, the intent of the rules is quite clear, the court's ruling was quite clear. The intention is to remove that information when searching for information about that person. If new information is added in the form of articles about it, they get added to the filter as well.
Um... Yeah. It's not really a story, it's just an on-going event that has been discussed to death here.
Re: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:oh boy here we go. (Score:0, Redundant)
To be honest I don't find this story at all surprising. I mean, the intent of the rules is quite clear, the court's ruling was quite clear. The intention is to remove that information when searching for information about that person. If new information is added in the form of articles about it, they get added to the filter as well.
Um... Yeah. It's not really a story, it's just an on-going event that has been discussed to death here.
Re:oh boy here we go. (Score:4)
Those who forget history are doomed to relive the worst parts.